1961 AC Greyhound vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1963 Ford Zodiac is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 255 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 191 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |