1961 AC Greyhound vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Greyhound | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | AC | Triumph |
| Model | Greyhound | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
