1961 AC Greyhound vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 AC Greyhound weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm). This means 1961 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Greyhound | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 131 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |