1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 730 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2000 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Greyhound | Seville |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 400 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |