1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Greyhound | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 332 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3000 mm |