1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (119 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 290 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (181 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | AC | Daewoo |
Model | Greyhound | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 48 L |