1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Ford Puma
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 20 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Puma. (148 Nm). This means 1961 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2005 Ford Puma | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Puma |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |