1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 700 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Ranger |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 257 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |