1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | AC | Land Rover |
Model | Greyhound | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 391 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 104 L |