1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Acura RL
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Greyhound | 2009 Acura RL | |
| Make | AC | Acura |
| Model | Greyhound | RL |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 367 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |
