1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 701 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Greyhound | Charger |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 339 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |