1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Compass weights approximately 413 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (223 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Greyhound | Compass |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 223 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 51 L |