1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (616 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | ML |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 616 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 93 L |