1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 327 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Juke (240 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | Juke |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1342 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |