1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 805 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Greyhound | XC60 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |