1961 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1961 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1579 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Greyhound | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 565 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2947 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |