1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 has manual transmission. 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 2600 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2583 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
