1961 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 967 kg more than 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Spider | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 4162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 95 L |
