1961 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | Spider | Epica |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
