1961 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 114 kg more than 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Because 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | Spider | Compass |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 51 L |