1961 Alpine A 108 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alpine A 108 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1961 Alpine A 108. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1961 Alpine A 108. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 545 kg more than 1961 Alpine A 108. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Alpine A 108 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Alpine | Sunbeam |
Model | A 108 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1961 | 1964 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 843 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2190 mm |