1961 Aston Martin DB2 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DB2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DB2 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DB2. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DB2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 915 kg more than 1961 Aston Martin DB2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Aston Martin DB2 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | DB2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2922 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 79 L |
