1961 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DB4. (238 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DB4.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Aston Martin DB4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Aston Martin DB4. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Aston Martin DB4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Aston Martin DB4 | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Audi |
| Model | DB4 | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3668 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
