1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBR2 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |