1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | DBR2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 68 L |
