1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher.
Because 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2009 Chrysler Town & Country | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chrysler |
Model | DBR2 | Town & Country |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 71 L |