1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Aston Martin | Nissan |
Model | DBR2 | Armada |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 106 L |