1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (430 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Aston Martin | Aston Martin |
Model | DBR2 | Vantage |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 430 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2022 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 80 L |