1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (180 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chevrolet |
Model | DBR2 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 71 L |