1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (405 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBR2 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 405 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5603 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1994 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3378 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 98 L |