1961 Austin 7 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Austin 7 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1142 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | 62 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 6.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3210 mm |