1961 Austin 7 vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1961 Austin 7 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 500 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 7 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1961 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 60 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |