1961 Austin 7 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1445 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 522 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | 62 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |