1961 Austin 7 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1964 Nissan Cedric is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 475 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1961 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |