1961 Austin 7 vs. 1982 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Zastava 2101 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 2101 (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 2101 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin 7 | 1982 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | 7 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |
