1961 Austin 7 vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 1992 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,107 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault Clio (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Clio weights approximately 200 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault Clio (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin 7 | 1992 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | 7 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
