1961 Austin 7 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 775 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 1996 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |