1961 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 374 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 7 | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |