1961 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 577 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 56 L |