1961 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 959 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |