1961 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (187 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | 3 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |