1961 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 7 | E |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |