1961 Austin 7 vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZR weights approximately 510 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Austin | MG |
Model | 7 | ZR |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |