1961 Austin 7 vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 842 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1452 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |