1961 Austin 7 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1077 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | 7 | LS |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |