1961 Austin 7 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 920 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (461 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 61 L |