1961 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 390 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 7 | Colt |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 47 L |