1961 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C70 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 7 | C70 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |