1961 Austin 7 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin 7 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | 7 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |
