1961 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1146 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | CTS |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |